The British Labour Party has convened its annual conference in Liverpool under a cloud of existential threat, with recent polling showing the party trailing Nigel Farage's Reform UK by significant margins. According to More in Common institute data, Labour would secure only 90 parliamentary seats in an election, a dramatic decline from their current 411 seats, while Reform UK would surge from 5 to 373 seats, giving them a clear parliamentary majority. This seismic shift would mark the end of Britain's traditional two-party system that has dominated politics for a century.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer opened the conference by acknowledging the severity of the challenge, telling BBC viewers that "we have the fight of our lives ahead of us, we must confront Reform, we must beat them." He characterized the contest as a battle for "the soul of our nation" and warned that the right-wing populists would "tear this country apart." Starmer specifically criticized Reform UK's immigration policies as "racist" and "immoral," referencing their proposal to revoke permanent residency status for non-European migrants.

The Labour leader faces mounting internal challenges just fifteen months after taking office. The party has been rocked by the resignation of Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner over a tax error, the departure of several Downing Street advisors, and the dismissal of US Ambassador Peter Mandelson due to his connections with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Meanwhile, Britain's economic indicators show slowing growth, unemployment at a four-year high, record illegal immigration, and inflation rates exceeding those in other European countries.

Political analysts suggest the Liverpool conference represents a critical moment for Labour's survival. Professor Steven Fielding noted that the gathering provides an opportunity for party members to "express their discontent" with the current leadership. The conference opened with protests outside the venue, where approximately one hundred demonstrators displayed banners supporting Palestine Action, an organization the government has designated as terrorist. With the next general election scheduled for 2029, Starmer faces the daunting task of convincing both his party and the electorate that he can reverse Labour's declining fortunes against the surging Reform UK movement.

Families of the 29 victims killed in the 1994 Chinook helicopter crash are escalating their decades-long fight for answers, preparing to deliver a petition with more than 47,000 signatures to Downing Street demanding a public inquiry. The Chinook Justice Campaign has published 110 "critical questions" they want answered about the tragedy that claimed the lives of 25 intelligence experts and four special forces crew members when the aircraft crashed on the Mull of Kintyre on June 2, 1994.

The campaign comes after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer rejected calls for a judge-led inquiry into the incident, prompting families to declare they will "see the UK government in court." Among those delivering the petition on Tuesday are brothers Andy and Matt Tobias from Watford, whose father John Tobias was killed in the crash. The petition delivery will be accompanied by an attempt to deliver a letter directly to the Ministry of Defence.

Central to the families' concerns are questions about mission authorization, aircraft selection, and whether those on board were properly warned of risks. The campaign has gained momentum amid revelations that key documents related to the crash have been sealed until 2094—a century after the incident occurred. David Hill, technical expert for the Chinook Justice Campaign, characterized the government's position as "a betrayal by the state of them and their loved ones."

The crash investigation has followed a contentious path over the past three decades. Initial findings blamed pilot error for the tragedy, but this conclusion was overturned in 2011. The continuing secrecy surrounding the incident has drawn criticism from campaigners who argue it "undermines trust not only in the MoD but in the government itself." As families prepare to confront the government directly, the case represents one of Britain's longest-running military accountability battles.