The Scottish Parliament is set to vote on the general principles of the Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill, a piece of legislation that could mark a significant shift in the country's approach to end-of-life care. Introduced by Liberal Democrat MSP Liam McArthur, the bill seeks to allow adults in the advanced stages of a terminal illness to seek medical assistance to end their lives, provided they meet strict eligibility criteria. This vote represents the third time such legislation has been considered by Holyrood, reflecting a growing debate over the rights of terminally ill individuals to choose the manner and timing of their death.

Supporters of the bill argue that it would provide terminally ill Scots with autonomy, dignity, and control over their end-of-life decisions, alleviating unnecessary suffering. Polls suggest a broad base of public support across various demographics, including age, political affiliation, and religious belief. However, the bill has also faced opposition from critics who fear it could place undue pressure on vulnerable individuals, including those with disabilities, to end their lives prematurely. High-profile figures such as First Minister John Swinney and Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar have announced their intention to vote against the legislation.

The stage one vote, scheduled for Tuesday evening, is a critical juncture for the bill's progression. If it passes, the legislation will move to the committee stage for further scrutiny and potential amendments before a final vote in the chamber. Failure at this initial stage would likely delay any reconsideration until after the next Holyrood election. The debate has sparked demonstrations outside the Scottish Parliament, with campaigners from both sides making their voices heard as MSPs prepare to cast their votes.

As the Scottish Parliament grapples with this deeply personal and ethically complex issue, the outcome of the vote will have profound implications for terminally ill individuals and their families. The bill's proponents, including Mr. McArthur, remain hopeful that the shifting political mood and overwhelming public support will persuade a majority of MSPs to back the general principles of the legislation, paving the way for a more compassionate approach to end-of-life care in Scotland.

Recent revelations have shed light on the early reservations held by a close confidante of the late Queen Elizabeth II regarding Meghan Markle's relationship with Prince Harry. Lady Elizabeth Anson, a cousin of the Queen and a respected figure within royal circles, reportedly expressed doubts about the sincerity of Meghan's feelings for Harry, suggesting that the former actress might have 'engineered' their romance. These claims, brought to light by royal biographer Sally Bedell Smith, highlight the tensions that existed within the royal family prior to the couple's 2018 wedding.

According to Bedell Smith's account, Lady Anson, who was known for her close relationship with the Queen and her role as a royal party planner, initially found Meghan to be 'full of charm' and 'intelligent and thoughtful' upon her engagement to Harry. However, as the wedding approached, Lady Anson's perspective shifted, leading her to question whether Meghan was truly in love with Harry or if she had orchestrated their relationship for personal gain. 'We hope but don't quite think she is in love. We think she engineered it all,' Lady Anson is reported to have said.

The biographer also recounts Lady Anson's concerns about the dynamic between Meghan and Harry, noting that Meghan's intelligence and strength could overshadow Harry's more subdued personality. 'Meghan is clearly brighter than Harry, but she has to be careful not to overshadow him,' Lady Anson allegedly remarked. These comments reflect the broader unease within parts of the royal family about the couple's compatibility and the potential challenges their union might bring to the monarchy.

In response to these claims, a spokesperson for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex has declined to comment, while a source close to the couple dismissed the allegations as 'just gossip.' Nonetheless, these revelations offer a glimpse into the private discussions and concerns that surrounded one of the most talked-about royal weddings in recent history, underscoring the complexities of integrating a Hollywood actress into the centuries-old traditions of the British royal family.