EasyJet is under scrutiny after a breastfeeding mother, Daisy Crawford, reported a distressing experience at Bristol Airport, where she was informed she would be charged an additional £50 for carrying breast milk and a pump on her flight to Belfast. The incident, which occurred on April 27, has sparked a debate over airline policies regarding the transportation of breast milk and the treatment of passengers in sensitive situations.

Ms. Crawford described the staff's demeanor as 'stony faced' and lacking in understanding, exacerbating her distress. She emphasized the importance of the breast milk for her premature baby, a detail she felt was overlooked by the airline personnel. The situation escalated when she was told she had 'no choice' but to pay the fee unless she could fit all her items into a single cabin bag, a task that proved impossible without sacrificing personal belongings.

The mother of three attempted to access online guidelines for traveling with breast milk but was hindered by poor signal. She recounted being told by staff, 'we've given you time,' a statement that only added to her frustration. The incident highlights the challenges faced by breastfeeding mothers when navigating airline policies and the need for greater sensitivity and clarity from airlines.

EasyJet has yet to publicly respond to the incident, but the story has ignited a conversation on social media about the rights of breastfeeding mothers and the importance of accommodating their needs without imposing undue financial or emotional burdens. As the debate continues, many are calling for airlines to review their policies to prevent similar situations in the future.

Recent revelations have shed light on the early reservations held by a close confidante of the late Queen Elizabeth II regarding Meghan Markle's relationship with Prince Harry. Lady Elizabeth Anson, a cousin of the Queen and a respected figure within royal circles, reportedly expressed doubts about the sincerity of Meghan's feelings for Harry, suggesting that the former actress might have 'engineered' their romance. These claims, brought to light by royal biographer Sally Bedell Smith, highlight the tensions that existed within the royal family prior to the couple's 2018 wedding.

According to Bedell Smith's account, Lady Anson, who was known for her close relationship with the Queen and her role as a royal party planner, initially found Meghan to be 'full of charm' and 'intelligent and thoughtful' upon her engagement to Harry. However, as the wedding approached, Lady Anson's perspective shifted, leading her to question whether Meghan was truly in love with Harry or if she had orchestrated their relationship for personal gain. 'We hope but don't quite think she is in love. We think she engineered it all,' Lady Anson is reported to have said.

The biographer also recounts Lady Anson's concerns about the dynamic between Meghan and Harry, noting that Meghan's intelligence and strength could overshadow Harry's more subdued personality. 'Meghan is clearly brighter than Harry, but she has to be careful not to overshadow him,' Lady Anson allegedly remarked. These comments reflect the broader unease within parts of the royal family about the couple's compatibility and the potential challenges their union might bring to the monarchy.

In response to these claims, a spokesperson for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex has declined to comment, while a source close to the couple dismissed the allegations as 'just gossip.' Nonetheless, these revelations offer a glimpse into the private discussions and concerns that surrounded one of the most talked-about royal weddings in recent history, underscoring the complexities of integrating a Hollywood actress into the centuries-old traditions of the British royal family.