EasyJet is under scrutiny after a breastfeeding mother, Daisy Crawford, reported a distressing experience at Bristol Airport, where she was informed she would be charged an additional £50 for carrying breast milk and a pump on her flight to Belfast. The incident, which occurred on April 27, has sparked a debate over airline policies regarding the transportation of breast milk and the treatment of passengers in sensitive situations.

Ms. Crawford described the staff's demeanor as 'stony faced' and lacking in understanding, exacerbating her distress. She emphasized the importance of the breast milk for her premature baby, a detail she felt was overlooked by the airline personnel. The situation escalated when she was told she had 'no choice' but to pay the fee unless she could fit all her items into a single cabin bag, a task that proved impossible without sacrificing personal belongings.

The mother of three attempted to access online guidelines for traveling with breast milk but was hindered by poor signal. She recounted being told by staff, 'we've given you time,' a statement that only added to her frustration. The incident highlights the challenges faced by breastfeeding mothers when navigating airline policies and the need for greater sensitivity and clarity from airlines.

EasyJet has yet to publicly respond to the incident, but the story has ignited a conversation on social media about the rights of breastfeeding mothers and the importance of accommodating their needs without imposing undue financial or emotional burdens. As the debate continues, many are calling for airlines to review their policies to prevent similar situations in the future.

Families of the 29 victims killed in the 1994 Chinook helicopter crash are escalating their decades-long fight for answers, preparing to deliver a petition with more than 47,000 signatures to Downing Street demanding a public inquiry. The Chinook Justice Campaign has published 110 "critical questions" they want answered about the tragedy that claimed the lives of 25 intelligence experts and four special forces crew members when the aircraft crashed on the Mull of Kintyre on June 2, 1994.

The campaign comes after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer rejected calls for a judge-led inquiry into the incident, prompting families to declare they will "see the UK government in court." Among those delivering the petition on Tuesday are brothers Andy and Matt Tobias from Watford, whose father John Tobias was killed in the crash. The petition delivery will be accompanied by an attempt to deliver a letter directly to the Ministry of Defence.

Central to the families' concerns are questions about mission authorization, aircraft selection, and whether those on board were properly warned of risks. The campaign has gained momentum amid revelations that key documents related to the crash have been sealed until 2094—a century after the incident occurred. David Hill, technical expert for the Chinook Justice Campaign, characterized the government's position as "a betrayal by the state of them and their loved ones."

The crash investigation has followed a contentious path over the past three decades. Initial findings blamed pilot error for the tragedy, but this conclusion was overturned in 2011. The continuing secrecy surrounding the incident has drawn criticism from campaigners who argue it "undermines trust not only in the MoD but in the government itself." As families prepare to confront the government directly, the case represents one of Britain's longest-running military accountability battles.