Rio Tinto, the $160 billion global mining giant, has successfully resisted an activist investor's push to review its dual-listed structure, with shareholders overwhelmingly voting against the proposal. The London-based hedge fund Palliser Capital had sought to unify the company's listings under a single Australian entity, arguing that the current structure is outdated and could unlock significant value for shareholders. However, less than 20% of the votes cast at the annual general meetings supported the review, falling short of the threshold required under UK corporate governance rules to mandate further consultation.

The outcome represents a significant victory for Rio Tinto's board, which had strongly opposed the proposal, citing potential tax costs in the mid-single digit billions of US dollars and asserting that unification is not in the best interests of shareholders or the company as a whole. The board's stance was supported by a wide consultation with shareholders, who ultimately agreed that the dual-listed structure should remain in place. This decision underscores the challenges activist investors face when attempting to sway large, established corporations with complex global operations.

Palliser Capital's campaign had drawn parallels with BHP's decision to move its primary listing to Sydney in 2022, following pressure from activist investors. However, Rio Tinto's shareholders, particularly those holding UK-listed stock which comprises about 77% of the investor base, showed little appetite for change. The Australian-listed shares, trading at a premium of about 25%, reflect the tax advantages available to Australian shareholders, a factor that may have influenced the voting outcome.

The rejection of Palliser's proposal also highlights the broader debate about the future of London's stock market, which has seen several high-profile companies consider or execute moves away from the UK. Despite these challenges, Rio Tinto's decision to maintain its dual-listed structure signals confidence in the current setup, at least for the foreseeable future. The company's ability to fend off the activist campaign may serve as a case study for other corporations facing similar pressures, demonstrating the importance of board-shareholder alignment in corporate governance decisions.

EasyJet has reported a headline pre-tax loss of £394 million for the six months ending March, marking a slight improvement from the £350 million loss recorded in the same period last year. The airline attributes this marginal betterment, approximately £50 million, to the later timing of Easter this year, which has historically influenced seasonal demand for air travel. Despite the winter losses, the company remains optimistic about the upcoming summer season, traditionally a profitable period for airlines.

The carrier transported 18.2 million passengers in the first quarter, an 8% increase compared to the previous year, signaling a robust recovery in travel demand. Furthermore, EasyJet's package holiday division showcased a significant 42% year-on-year growth, with pre-tax profits reaching £44 million for the half-year. This performance underscores the airline's successful strategy to diversify its offerings and capture a larger share of the travel market.

Kenton Jarvis, EasyJet's chief executive, highlighted the airline's commitment to enhancing customer experience and operational efficiency as key drivers of its strategy. The announcement of a new base in Newcastle, set to open next spring, reflects EasyJet's ambition to expand its network and provide customers with more choices for flights and holidays across Europe and the UK.

Looking ahead, EasyJet is focused on achieving another record summer, with expectations of strong earnings growth. The airline's long-term goal of sustainably generating over £1 billion in annual pre-tax profit remains a central focus, as it continues to navigate the challenges and opportunities of the aviation industry.