In the wake of a violent attack by Hashem Abedi, the brother of the Manchester Arena bomber, on prison officers at HMP Frankland, the UK's prison staff are calling for enhanced safety measures. The incident, which involved homemade knives and hot oil, has reignited the debate over the safety of prison officers working with high-risk inmates. Mark Fairhurst, national chairman of the Prison Officers' Association, emphasized the need for tactical options like stun guns to neutralize threats effectively.

Official figures reveal a disturbing rise in violence within UK prisons, with HMP Frankland experiencing its highest assault rates in nearly a decade. The Ministry of Justice reported a record number of assaults on staff across England and Wales, underscoring the urgent need for improved security measures. In response, Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood has announced a trial deployment of Tasers and a review into the provision of stab vests for prison officers.

The attack at HMP Frankland has also prompted a temporary suspension of kitchen access for inmates in separation units, highlighting concerns over the management of high-risk prisoners. The move comes as part of broader efforts to reassess and enhance the safety protocols within the UK's prison system, ensuring the protection of both staff and inmates.

As the Ministry of Justice continues to evaluate the effectiveness of current security measures, the incident at HMP Frankland serves as a stark reminder of the challenges faced by prison officers. The call for stun guns and body armor reflects a growing consensus on the need for more robust protections in an increasingly volatile environment. The outcome of the ongoing reviews and trials will be closely watched by all stakeholders in the criminal justice system.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer's recent comments on immigration, warning that the UK risks becoming an 'island of strangers', have ignited a fiery debate across the political spectrum. During Prime Minister's Questions, Plaid Cymru's Westminster leader Liz Saville Roberts sharply criticized Starmer's shifting stance on immigration, accusing him of abandoning previous commitments to compassion and dignity for migrants. Starmer's retort, labeling her criticisms as 'rubbish', underscored the heated nature of the exchange.

The controversy stems from Starmer's speech, where he outlined plans to tighten immigration controls, including ending the recruitment of care workers from abroad and increasing English language requirements. These proposals have drawn both criticism and praise, revealing deep divisions within and outside his party. Backbench Labour MPs have expressed concerns, drawing parallels between Starmer's language and historical rhetoric on immigration that has been widely condemned.

Interestingly, Nigel Farage, leader of Reform UK, offered an unexpected endorsement of Starmer's speech, suggesting that the Prime Minister is 'learning a great deal' from his party. Farage's comments, coupled with his call for the government to declare the situation in the English Channel a 'national security emergency', add another layer to the ongoing debate over the UK's immigration policy and its future direction.

As the discussion unfolds, the contrasting reactions to Starmer's immigration speech highlight the challenges of navigating the complex and often polarizing issue of immigration in the UK. With criticism from within his own party and unexpected praise from political opponents, Starmer's approach to immigration continues to stir debate, reflecting broader societal divisions on how best to manage migration while fostering unity and security.