Duchess of Gloucester's Graceful Curtsy Highlights Royal Protocol at VE Day Service

09-05-2025


The Royal Family demonstrated a strong front during the 80th anniversary commemorations of VE Day, a series of events that culminated in a Service of Thanksgiving at Westminster Abbey and a concert in London's Horse Guards Parade. Despite concerns that Prince Harry's recent comments might overshadow the occasion, the family's collective participation, including a surprise appearance by Prince William and Princess Kate's children, underscored their unity and commitment to honoring the sacrifices of World War II veterans.

The Duchess of Gloucester, Birgitte, showcased royal etiquette with a perfect curtsy to King Charles and Queen Camilla during the VE Day thanksgiving service. This gesture, a hallmark of royal protocol, was observed as the senior royals departed Westminster Abbey. The event also highlighted the order of precedence among the royals, with the Duke and Duchess of Gloucester and the Duke of Kent seated first, followed by other members of the royal family, culminating in the arrival of the King and Queen.

Queen Camilla and Princess Kate made a striking statement in matching white outfits at the service, effectively dispelling rumors of any discord between them. Their coordinated appearance, along with the inclusion of personal touches such as Princess Kate wearing earrings that belonged to the late Princess Diana, added a layer of personal significance to the public commemoration. The handwritten notes on wreaths by Prince William and Princess Catherine, and King Charles III, further personalized the tribute to the war's fallen heroes.

The week's events not only celebrated the historical significance of VE Day but also showcased the Royal Family's ability to present a united front in the face of potential distractions. The participation of multiple generations of royals, from the King and Queen to the youngest members of the family, emphasized the continuity and enduring relevance of the monarchy in contemporary society. The careful observance of traditions, combined with personal gestures of remembrance, highlighted the family's dual role as custodians of national memory and as individuals with their own connections to history.

Other news

Families Demand Inquiry Into 1994 Chinook Crash With 47,000-Signature Petition

{'$date': '2025-10-20T11:49:57.546Z'}


Families of the 29 victims killed in the 1994 Chinook helicopter crash are escalating their decades-long fight for answers, preparing to deliver a petition with more than 47,000 signatures to Downing Street demanding a public inquiry. The Chinook Justice Campaign has published 110 "critical questions" they want answered about the tragedy that claimed the lives of 25 intelligence experts and four special forces crew members when the aircraft crashed on the Mull of Kintyre on June 2, 1994.

The campaign comes after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer rejected calls for a judge-led inquiry into the incident, prompting families to declare they will "see the UK government in court." Among those delivering the petition on Tuesday are brothers Andy and Matt Tobias from Watford, whose father John Tobias was killed in the crash. The petition delivery will be accompanied by an attempt to deliver a letter directly to the Ministry of Defence.

Central to the families' concerns are questions about mission authorization, aircraft selection, and whether those on board were properly warned of risks. The campaign has gained momentum amid revelations that key documents related to the crash have been sealed until 2094—a century after the incident occurred. David Hill, technical expert for the Chinook Justice Campaign, characterized the government's position as "a betrayal by the state of them and their loved ones."

The crash investigation has followed a contentious path over the past three decades. Initial findings blamed pilot error for the tragedy, but this conclusion was overturned in 2011. The continuing secrecy surrounding the incident has drawn criticism from campaigners who argue it "undermines trust not only in the MoD but in the government itself." As families prepare to confront the government directly, the case represents one of Britain's longest-running military accountability battles.