Scotland solemnly marked the 80th anniversary of VE Day with a series of tributes across Glasgow and Edinburgh, reflecting on the sacrifices made during the Second World War and the enduring lessons for today's world. In Glasgow, a two-minute silence enveloped the city, with residents pausing in streets, businesses, and train stations to honor the bravery of those who fought against Nazi Germany. The commemorations culminated in a thanksgiving service at Glasgow Cathedral, attended by military representatives, veterans' organizations, and elected officials, including Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes and Scotland Office minister Kirsty McNeill.

The day's events were not only a remembrance of past valor but also a moment to contemplate current global challenges. Scottish Greens co-leader Lorna Slater, speaking at FMQs, drew parallels between the fight against fascism during the Second World War and today's struggles against rising global violence and oppression. Her remarks underscored the importance of vigilance and unity in the face of threats to democracy and human rights, echoing the sentiments of many who see history's lessons as vital for navigating present and future challenges.

In Edinburgh, the UK Government's commemorations included a visit by Scottish Secretary Ian Murray to the Lady Haig Poppy Factory, where he met with World War II veterans. The factory, a symbol of remembrance and support for veterans, serves as a poignant reminder of the ongoing need to honor and assist those who have served. Murray's reflections on the significance of VE Day highlighted the day as a turning point in history, emphasizing the gratitude owed to the wartime generation for securing the freedoms enjoyed today.

As Scotland looked back on the 80th anniversary of VE Day, the commemorations served as a bridge between past and present, honoring the sacrifices of those who fought against tyranny while also calling attention to the need for peace and resistance against the resurgence of fascism and violence worldwide. The day's events, marked by silence, reflection, and speeches, offered a moment of unity and remembrance, reminding all of the cost of war and the preciousness of peace.

Recent revelations have shed light on the early reservations held by a close confidante of the late Queen Elizabeth II regarding Meghan Markle's relationship with Prince Harry. Lady Elizabeth Anson, a cousin of the Queen and a respected figure within royal circles, reportedly expressed doubts about the sincerity of Meghan's feelings for Harry, suggesting that the former actress might have 'engineered' their romance. These claims, brought to light by royal biographer Sally Bedell Smith, highlight the tensions that existed within the royal family prior to the couple's 2018 wedding.

According to Bedell Smith's account, Lady Anson, who was known for her close relationship with the Queen and her role as a royal party planner, initially found Meghan to be 'full of charm' and 'intelligent and thoughtful' upon her engagement to Harry. However, as the wedding approached, Lady Anson's perspective shifted, leading her to question whether Meghan was truly in love with Harry or if she had orchestrated their relationship for personal gain. 'We hope but don't quite think she is in love. We think she engineered it all,' Lady Anson is reported to have said.

The biographer also recounts Lady Anson's concerns about the dynamic between Meghan and Harry, noting that Meghan's intelligence and strength could overshadow Harry's more subdued personality. 'Meghan is clearly brighter than Harry, but she has to be careful not to overshadow him,' Lady Anson allegedly remarked. These comments reflect the broader unease within parts of the royal family about the couple's compatibility and the potential challenges their union might bring to the monarchy.

In response to these claims, a spokesperson for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex has declined to comment, while a source close to the couple dismissed the allegations as 'just gossip.' Nonetheless, these revelations offer a glimpse into the private discussions and concerns that surrounded one of the most talked-about royal weddings in recent history, underscoring the complexities of integrating a Hollywood actress into the centuries-old traditions of the British royal family.