The Scottish Parliament is set to vote on a controversial bill that would legalise assisted dying for terminally ill adults, sparking a heated debate among lawmakers and revealing divisions within the Scottish National Party (SNP). The bill, introduced by Liberal Democrat MSP Liam McArthur, proposes to allow mentally competent adults in the advanced stages of a terminal illness to seek assistance in ending their lives. The vote, scheduled for 13 May, will be a free vote, meaning MSPs will not be bound by party lines but will vote according to their conscience.

Former First Minister Humza Yousaf and current First Minister John Swinney have both voiced their opposition to the bill, citing concerns over the lack of sufficient safeguards to protect vulnerable individuals from potential coercion. Yousaf emphasized the irreversible nature of the decision, stating that the legislation would 'open a door that cannot be closed.' Swinney, who has consistently opposed similar bills in the past, reiterated his stance, highlighting the ethical and legal complexities surrounding the issue.

However, the SNP's unified front appears fractured as Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville announced her support for the bill. Somerville, who represents Dunfermline, acknowledged the profound impact of the issue on individuals across Scotland and stressed the importance of implementing 'enforceable protections' for vulnerable patients. Her decision underscores the personal and moral dilemmas faced by MSPs as they prepare to cast their votes.

The debate over assisted dying in Scotland reflects broader discussions on end-of-life care and individual autonomy. With the bill's progression hinging on the upcoming vote, the outcome will not only shape the future of assisted dying legislation in Scotland but also test the cohesion of the SNP. As MSPs grapple with their consciences, the nation watches closely, awaiting a decision that could redefine the boundaries of life and death in Scottish law.

London's Metropolitan Police has reversed its longstanding position on grooming gangs in the capital, acknowledging for the first time that it has multiple active investigations into group-based child sexual exploitation. The shift came after an investigation by MyLondon and The Daily Express challenged official statements from both police leadership and Mayor Sadiq Khan, who had consistently maintained there were "no reports" or "no indication" of Rochdale or Rotherham-style rape gangs operating in London.

The investigation uncovered evidence from four separate His Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services reports spanning 2016 to 2025 that documented at least six potential victims of grooming gang abuse. These case studies, which the Mayor of London personally responded to according to public statements, described children as young as 13 being exploited by groups of predatory men. The reports detailed how girls were plied with drugs and alcohol, raped in hotels by multiple perpetrators, and subjected to life-threatening situations.

Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley revealed to Assembly Members at City Hall that the force now acknowledges a "steady flow" of live multi-offender child sexual exploitation investigations and a "very significant" number of historic cases requiring reinvestigation. The commissioner estimated these reviews would cost "millions of pounds a year, for several years" to properly investigate, contradicting previous assertions that the force had "not seen" such cases in London.

Political figures including Reform UK MP Lee Anderson and Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp have criticized the mayor's handling of the situation, with Anderson stating there is "real, credible evidence that grooming gangs exist in London" and Philp alleging that Khan is "facilitating a cover-up." A spokesman for the mayor maintained that Khan has "always been clear that the safety of Londoners is his top priority" and remains "committed to doing all he can to protect children in London."